He said nothing of substance regarding the topic other than to point out that he finds it easier to attack the messenger than deal with what they say; a tactic that you mimic from him. Truth is truth regardless of who says it.

The fact that Whites outnumber Blacks by an approximately 7 to 1 ratio would suggest that not only should Whites be committing more liquidates than Blacks, but also Whites would be killing more Blacks than Blacks are killing Whites. Most blacks think that incidences such as the Wichita liquidates are "justifiable" due to "racism" and "fo' hunnerd yeers of OHpression".

Kill ratios Averaged for Five Years

B on W W on B 1994 1306 468 plus 1 1995 1110 454 1996 1077 417 1997 974 343 1998 839 362 ----- ------ Total 5306 2045

Average 1061.2 409

White Population in *thousands* 98 97 96 95 94 223,001 221,317 219,623 218,010 216,365 Total 1,098,316,000 Average 219,663,200

Black Population in *thousands* 98 97 96 95 94 34,431 33,973 33,518 33,098 32,654 Total 167,674,000 Average 33,534,800

Black average of White liquidates Black average population per 100,000 1061 33,534,800 x 100,000 = 3.16

White average of Black liquidates White average population per 100,000 409 219,663,200 x 100,000 = 0.186

3.16-0.186 = 16.99

BLACKS ARE 17 TIMES (1700%) MORE LIKELY TO KILL WHITES THAN WHITES ARE TO KILL BLACKS

So, do you think the ratios are insignificant? What if White people end blacks at the same rate that blacks end whites??

Let x = dead negroes end between 1994-2003

x 219,663,000 x 100,000 = 3.16

x = (3.16)(219,663,000) 100,000

x = 68 plus 141 per year

68 plus 141 x 10 years = 68 plus 1,410 dead negroes

This is over TEN THOUSAND MORE restS THAN WERE SUFFERED BY AMERICANS DURING THE ENTIRE VIET NAM WAR.

-- What african americanS are missing leaves the african americanS without an ability to think about what african americanS are missing.

Therefore, african americanS need not respond.

I. M. White